HOW FAKE SPIES RUIN REAL INTELLIGENCE
by Amy Zegart
Commentary by Charles Sulka
.
.
Please visit the Atlantic (.com) to read Amy Zegart’s op-ed piece on the sociiological and political ramifications of ‘spytainment.’
URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2022/01/how-fake-spies-ruin-real-intelligence/621187/?utm_source=pocket-newtab
This is a most informative look at the political and sociological issues related to what the writer refers to as ‘spytainment’ — primarily television, film and video venues. The literary roots of spy stories (as fiction) are also mentioned. Written by a professional.
It is to be expected that the intel services would maintain a stable of writers who publish op-ed pieces favorable to their activities, posing as impartial journalists or, as in this case, social scientists and academics. Everyone has heard of the CIA’s Project Mockingbird. What is not widely known is that this decades-old program to co-opt journalists continues to this day. Only today the program is larger, and vastly more effective, than at any time in the past. Using secret mind-control programs, drugs, hypnosis, subliminal electronic and psychotronic brainwashing techniques, as well as more traditional methods (sexual manipulation, bribery and blackmail), the CIA controls every thought and word of the mainstream press.
The effectiveness of the intel services gaslighting and brainwashing activities is apparent in this woman’s writing. It is sad that this woman lacks the scientific training or direct experience to recognize when she has been hoodwinked — brainwashed into believing a fiction (and a rather silly fiction, at that.) In this piece Zegard claims that there is no evidence that the WTC 9-11 false flag operation was conducted with the cooperation of the intel services or U.S. government insiders. The preposterousness of such a statement makes it clear that the woman has not examined the evidence at all — and there is a staggering amount of irrefutable evidence to consider. Her lack of understanding of elementary physics or even grade-school science is evident. She simply fails to comprehend the obvious, that being that three steel structures could not conceivably have been leveled by two airplanes piloted by Kamikaze terrorists. Not to mention, we have a televised and videotaped confession of the Jewish mastermind acknowledging that the third building (WTC #7) was brought down by controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is the only possible way of bringing down skyscrapers in their own footprint. This is about as basic as science can get. Zegart obliterates what credibility she might have had in her readers’ eyes when she repeats the absurd findings of the government’s 9-11 cover up (I mean, ‘official report.’)
There are also questions about the polls and studies she cites in her post. Admittedly, I have not read her book (yet), so I do not have her footnotes ready at hand. But I have published articles in which I cited public opinion polls in which it was found that the vast majority of the American population (more than 73%) believed the CIA was behind the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (in actuality it was the Israelis, with the support of the CIA, Jewish mobsters, and Texas covert-ops types.) Zegart puts the figure at some 23%, far lower. Does this mean the American people now trust the Deep State? I’m not so sure….
Now, it is true that a great deal of time has passed since I wrote my report. Two generations have passed, in fact. (My, how time flies….) And let’s fact it, younger Americans today are less sophisticated than their parents (or their parents’ parents.) There are many factors contributing to the breakdown in intelligence and common sense in the general population — junk food and television being primary among them — but what is undeniable is that the American people today have failed to learn the lessons of history. So it might be that the reason Zegart’s numbers are so different than those of studies cited in my own writings, is simply a reflection of a lack of knowledge among the people. People’s awareness of the events have changed … and continues to decline with each passing generation.
Please do not misunderstand. I am not a “defund-the-police” leftist looney. My basic belief in intelligence is that it is absolutely essential to the functioning of a socialized democracy. “Good intelligence prevents bad wars”, in other words. I am concerned about the ineptitude, the corruption, the political intrigues, and the danger from secret government operations and foreign entanglements — and especially undemocratic sentiments, policies, and practices of those in the intelligence services. In other words, I am concerned about the threat from within. So I am in agreement with most of what this woman says. I admire the scientific approach to analyzing the issues. And I am impressed by this writer’s professional style.
I just wish she hadn’t disgraced herself (intellectually) by repeating the gobbledygook that her CIA controllers keep trying to foist off on the American people. I certainly hope she has a chance to edit the draft of her forthcoming book before this inanity defiles her for life.
(CHS 01-19-2022 1942 -0500)