TRILATERAL COMMISSION – BANKERS’ COUP

Op-Ed by Matthew Ehret

URL: https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/12/how-the-trilateral-commission-drove-a-bankers-coup-across-america/

Charles Sulka Commentary

.

.

The historical analysis in this piece is very good. I particularly liked the unvarnished glimpse into the soul of Zbigniew Brzezinski, a refreshing change from the usual hagiography. It is hard to mistake a man’s own words, isn’t it?

Ehret demonstrates the right values and a take-no-prisoners attitude. The man is a born revolutionary. My one big concern is, he seems to be overlooking the unspeakable sins of the communist Chinese and the threat a totalitarian China poses to mankind’s freedom. Dreams of world unity through trade to the benefit of all under China’s leadership via their Belt & New Silk Road is naive. Seeing business and trade as being more important than political ideology is exactly the mistake that Nazi supporters made (then) and Zionist supporters make (now.)

To put it simply: the underlying proposition that must be always kept in mind when examining the philosophy of revolution is: The most powerful nation must be the most moral; the corollary is equally true: that the most moral nation must be the most powerful.

Ehret is a devotee of Lyndon LaRouche and the Shiller Institute, something he acknowledges on his (very professional) web site. I cannot fathom this, as LaRouche was a stark raving lunatic who wrote and spoke pure and utter nonsense. I know, as I’ve spent a good deal of time studying his publications, and trying to figure out who he really was and what he was about. His words are gibberish. LaRouche himself was a fraud, a con-artist, a paranoid-schizophrenic — a mental basket case. To be perfectly honest, I suspected the whole bunch of them (the LaRouche-ites) were aliens or, as many people suspected, part of a CIA operation set up to influence American politics. Both propositions circulated widely, and to me seemed equally plausible.

LaRouche was right about some things, though. The Jews really are a breed apart, financial parasites who, if not stopped, will destroy America; the nation’s private central bank, The Federal Reserve, really was a plot by Jewish bankers to dupe the nation into perpetual debt; international financiers (mostly Jews) really are trying to gobble up the entire world and enslave mankind in a neo-feudal New World Order; America is the New Age Babylon, the Kingdom of the Cults, the Great Satan which threatens the entire world; and the British Royal family really are pedophiles and spies for Israel and the Rothschilds.

None of this is news; all of this and more has been revealed through the power of the internet. It turns out that LaRouche was right all along, about many things. LaRouche could be right about a number of other things, too, but that doesn’t change the fact that he was dangerous and unbalanced. Be that as it may, the man still had excellent intelligence sources.

In conclusion, my take on Ehret: natural revolutionary, talented writer, right values … but the man is naive, demonstrating a lack of political sophistication. He evidences not only immersion in the LaRouche insanity but his adoption of that convoluted belief system himself.

I do not have any experience with ‘exorcising’ political demons. The ghost of Lyndon LaRouche is a daunting specter. To be perfectly clear about it: there is no political figure, past or present, who commands less respect from thoughtful people than Lyndon LaRouche … and that is because he was a certifiable mental case.

However, like Adolph Hitler, Charles Manson, Josef Stalin, and the legendary psychopath Rasputin, LaRouche had some hypnotic power that enabled him to attract followers like a magnet. Ehret has obviously been sucked into the psychic vortex created by Lyndon LaRouche, and has allowed LaRouche’s insanity to influence his own thinking. Ehret is obviously not stupid … but something sinister is affecting his thinking about LaRouche. Ehret could be a victim of CIA mind-control, drugs, hypnosis, demonic possession … or he could even be an alien himself.

As I said, I am not in the business of exorcising political demons. I would have to be convinced that Ehret has had an epiphony, if you will, and has seen the error of his ways. I would need to know that he is not a dupe of Communist China before I would refer anyone to his writings.

(chs 08-26-2019 2054 -0500)