I SAY IT WAS POLTERGEISTS – THE DETOWERING FINALLY EXPLAINED
BY FRED REED
THE UNZ REVIEW (SEPTEMBER 17, 2021)
URL: https://www.unz.com/freed/i-say-it-was-poltergeists/
.
COMMENTARY BY CHARLES SULKA
.
.
———-
FRED REED LOSES IT
This piece by Fred Reed is embarrassingly stupid. Everything that Reed claims is a “conspiracy theory” — a term used by disinformation agents to discredit critical thinking and analysis — is actually true. All of these things Reed scoffs at as Jewish ‘conspiracies’ are in reality part of a long litany of the Jews’ betrayal of this nation, from giving the secrets of the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union, to the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy and his brother, U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, to Israel’s slaughter of American seamen in an attack on the unarmed U.S.S. Liberty (the Jews machine gunned the survivors in life rafts), Israel’s attack on the U.S.S. Cole, another false-flag operation, and now this. And it looks like the Synagogue of Satan will continue to get away with their heinous crimes because America is too blind to see the criminal activities — conspiracies, if you will — of The Enemy Within. Yes, the Jews, in collaboration with insiders in America’s national security establishment did bring down the three World Trade Center towers (WTC 9-11) and launch a missile into the Pentagon, killing thousands of civilians and service men alike. The 9-11 World Trade Center false flag operation and attack on the Pentagon would hardly be the first assault against America and American values by the Synagogue of Satan. Indeed, the Jews have a long history of espionage and treachery against this nation.
Here is but one quick example of how the Jews — and now Reed himself — spew lies and confusion through disinformation. In this case, the technique is misdirection. Reed ‘debunks’ the (undeniable, even for those without military training) fact that controlled demolition brought down the three skyscrapers on 9-11. (That’s right: TWO airplanes supposedly brought down THREE skyscrapers … an impossible feat.) We have the videotaped confession of one of the ringleaders (Silverstein) admitting they brought down the third skyscraper (‘pulled it’, a term used in controlled demolition.) I guess for Reed, a videotaped confession is not enough. At least not if the perpetrators belong to the Synagogue of Satan. Why? Because Jews are very intelligent.
In this execrable exercise in deception, Reed deliberately misleads the reader with a false analysis which purportedly explains the implausibility of it all. Reed claims the outer columns of the building could not have been rigged with explosives without occupants of the buildings being aware of it. The problem is, no one — ABSOLUTELY NO ONE — has ever suggested that the outer columns were compromised. This would be absurd. This is not how controlled demolition is done. The building’s inner structure (not the outer columns) were rigged with explosives. This is how a building is brought down in its own footprint; the building collapses in on itself because its inner structure has been demolished.
Being ex-military, Reed presumably would know this. I say presumably because it is not clear that Reed actually took his military service seriously or learned anything of value while in uniform. He admits to having spent his war years getting high in the dins of iniquity of Asia; he calls his wartime haunts the ‘fleshpots’ of Asia. It sounds like Reed may have come back from the war with a drug-addled brain, like so many other Vietnam Vets. War is hell.
There is a plethora of evidence showing the building was rigged with military-grade explosives by the Israeli-led maintenance and security personnel. The Jews did it. This is a fact. It is all but undeniable. In fact, nobody denies it … except America’s security services, who were in on the plot from the beginning. Reed’s denying reality and obscuring the truth with a specious misdirection is shameful. His words offend not only his readers, but reason itself.
And God. By coming to the defense of the forces of evil — covering up the never-ending crimes against humanity committed by the Zionist horde — Reed offends not just mankind, but God himself. Reed needs to repudiate his alliance with the Synagogue of Satan before it is too late. And time is running out.
From a review of the man’s own words, the reader can only assume that Reed is a MOSSAD plant, possibly fitted with a tooth radio himself. Reed is no doubt worried that all of those he associated with when he was writing for the defense establishment and Soldier of Fortune Magazine will suspect he was spying on them for the Israelis. Presumably he was; this would be a reasonable assumption. The Jews spy on everyone; this is what they do. This is how a small group of individuals can control the masses: intrusion, behind-the scenes manipulation, corruption, deceit, subversion, propaganda, blackmail, and importantly, economic exploitation. These are the tactics the Jews use; these are the tactics the Jews have always used throughout history. This is the basis of their plan for world domination. Their aim is to enslave the human race to Zionist masters in a neo-feudal New World Order. This dream of lording it over the rest of humanity is central to the Jews collective psyche.
Reed ended an earlier article by saying he is going into hiding. Maybe he should. I know I would go into hiding if I had written this drivel.
It is a shame that such a great writer has been co-opted by the forces of evil.
(CHS 12-23-2021 1912 -0500 / 08-05-2023 1920 -0500)
———-
I Say It Was Poltergeists
The Detowering Finally Explained
Fred Reed
In my decades as galley slave in Washington’s journalistic sludge fleets, I occasionally encountered conspiracy theories, such as the Second Shooter who got JFK, and that FDR intentionally let the Japs blow up Pearl Harbor, and of many sightings of alien space ships. Various psychic oddities dwelling in the crevices of the Potomac Rome worried about fluoride in the water. Like most news weasels who had a living to make, I ignored them as being fringe notions and wackos, which they later proved to be, the stories if not always the people. In any event they seemed few.
Then came Nine Eleven and Covid and there were millions of conspiracy theorists (CTs). Their numbers elevated them from peculiarities to a sort of contained nation within the polity and, in the case of the vaccine worriers, a public danger in that they blocked efforts against the virus. Yet one cannot reasonably relegate a large fraction of the country to the realms of mental disturbance without explanation. What was going on? Perhaps it was another manifestation of the malaise and anxiety and creeping hopelessness that gnaw at so much of America.
Most of their theories were nuttier than Aunt Polly’s prize fruitcake, that Dad poured rum on every year at Christmas and lit on fire. For example, a photo of the Grassy Knoll from above showed it to be the last place in Dallas that anyone would put a sniper, being small, almost without concealment, surrounded on all sides by busy urban streets, and overlooked by tall buildings with lots of windows. The inability of CTs to notice radical incoherence and protuberant flaws like this in their conspiratorial ointment (or is it flies in ointment?) is characteristic of the species.
To my astonishment, I discovered that many among conservative friends believed in the FEMA camps and such, and that they became angry if these were questioned. So I stopped.
The contradictions in these tales were obvious as boils on a pole dancer, as were stark implausibilities and lack of knowledge of the underlying fields. While the theories themselves soon ceased to be interesting, the psychology of the believers fascinated me. There are a lot of theories and, I noticed men (almost all CTs are) who believe in one almost always believe in many. A few of the more popular
FDR helped the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor. Black helicopters of some presumably nefarious sort fly over America. A hundred FEMA concentration camps, manned but as yet empty, exist to be stuffed with patriots or conservatives or somebody. The Navy shot down TWA 800. The Jews (or, in other popular versions, the CIA, Mafia, LBJ’s people, or Cuban intelligence killed JFK. The second shooter did it. The government is buying up, or has bought up, thousands of coffins for I’m not sure exactly what purpose. The Jews killed RFK. Obama wasn’t a US citizen. Covid doesn’t exist. While not existing, it contains microchips to track us. Also nanoparticles that do something probably not good. Also mRNA to reprogram our DNA. The Jews blew up the Twin Towers. The military blew up the Pentagon with a missile. The Jews killed Forrestal. Miracle cures for covid exist but are hidden by the government, or most world governments, to (a) make money for Big Pharma, (b) to train us to obedience as communist robots. The purpose of the virus is to depopulate the planet. Lots and lots of POWs and MIAs were knowingly left behind in Vietnam by the Pentagon. Space aliens are stored at Roswell and flying saucers are virtually everywhere. There is a huge conspiracy to pretend that large numbers of people are dying of Covid. Earlier there was a huge conspiracy to prove they weren’t. The Jews, nothing if not busy, are destroying white Christian civilization. Dominion voting machines were hacked. Fluoride in the water is softening our brains (but, presumably, hardening our teeth.) The Towers were blown up by mini-nukes, the airplanes didn’t exist but were holograms, and pools of molten steel were found under the rubble months later.
There is apparently among CTs a gentleman’s agreement that enthusiasts of one theory will not criticize a mutually exclusive theory For example, when the Twin Towers fell, huge steel beams were allegedly hurled long distances, proving the use of explosives, but the buildings also supposedly fell neatly in their “footprints,” proving “controlled demolition.” At least one of these has to be wrong.
Why CTs, often no dummies, do not notice these impossibilities puzzles me. Any tale is welcomed, though not necessarily accepted in preference to one’s own, as long as it criticizes the “official story” (which usually means “what happened.”)
Maybe to be well twisted you have to start with enough string. The fair few among my friends are otherwise normal and, while mostly conservative, fall within the political mainstream, at leas as loosely defined.
Billions of words have been written by now about almost as many theories of Nine-Eleven but none answers the prior question of whether the conspiracy was possible. This baffles me.
A tale: In Marine Corps basic—OK, AIT, Advanced Infantry Training at Lejeune—we had a (very, very) short course in demolitions. It consisted in crimping a blasting cap onto a length of fuse, inserting it in a block of c4, lighting the fuse, and running like hell to the other side of the berm (“Fire in the hole.”) We saw demonstrations of how to use det cord to connect multiple blocks of boom stuff, but didn’t actually do it. I’m pretty sure I could have dropped a small rural bridge in Vietnam, but not much else.
One thing the instructors stressed—we probably would have figured it out all by ourselves—was that to bring something down, you needed to cut the supports that held it up.
Applying this complex reasoning to the Twin Towers, a Marine would reason that here too the supporting elements needed to be cut. What were these? Answer: the fifty-nine huge steel uprights on each face of the building. Where were these? Answer: In plain sight of all of the workers in the offices on the outer face of the building. Great big things, covered with wood facing or plaster, but visible. Visible every day. All day. Would not a CT, if he wanted to be believed by anyone outside of the community of the faithful, at a minimum have to explain how the Mossad agents rigged these pillars for demolition without being noticed?
No.
CTs don’t think this way. All you have to do is believe, to know without finding out, to accept without checking. The CTs aren’t lying, aren’t trying to fool the public. If they were, they would try to inject a degree of plausibility into the story. Nor do they seem to want to convince a wider public or, again, they would answer the essential questions. If you want me to believe that the Israelis did do it, you have to show me that they could have done it. If they couldn’t have, they probably didn’t. Weirdly, CTs on the web become much angrier at me for doubting their theories than at the Israelis who, they assert, killed three thousand Americans. I do not recall hearing a demand for even a diplomatic protest, much less carpet bombing Tel Aviv, appropriate if Israel did it.
(As of fifteen minutes ago, I have encountered a new kink in this rope: The explosives were built into the Towers at the time of construction. I suppose by a large gang of Mossad agents pretending to be construction workers The towers were finished in 1973, making them a monument to terroristic forethought. The more you look at this stuff, the sillier it gets, but CTs don´t notice.)
If the aim is to blame Israel, I can cook up a better story in two minutes: Diabolical Mossad agents, pretending to be Arabs, talked the hijackers into the idea of the hijackings and gave them funding. Bingo. This would be almost impossible to disprove (or prove), could be applied to the CIA or anyone else desired, and leave the “official story” functioning. But this would be boring.
I don’t get it. Give me one story, about covid or the Towers, stick to it, show it clearly to be physically possible. Failing this, I have to think the we are dealing with shapes swirling in the inner fog instead of reality. Although I concede that traces of pixie dust were found in the rubble, and witnesses report a dancing light, consistent with Tinker Belle….
Traipsing Through Wonderlands
Chronicles of a wild life in biker bars and the fleshpots of Bangkok, of years of solo hitchhiking across America, of a Southern boyhood of drag racing in old wrecks and guns and beer, of Marine Corps boot camp and Moon’s strange church, of scuba diving the deep walls of the Caribbean and cave diving in Mexico, of life on staff at Soldier of Fortune magazine and nine years as police reporter for the Washington Times in the weird, sad, and often unbelievable urban Petri dishes of the big cities. Politically incorrect and evilly funny, Fred takes no prisoners. He skews with murderous wit things he doesn’t like, which are many: pols, talking heads, officious do-gooders. He has a soft spot for things he does like, such as dogs, drunks, bar girls, and ambulance crews, of all of which he has known many. His work has appeared in Playboy, Harper’s, the Washington Post magazine and op-ed pages, and suchlike stations of the literary cross. The literary cross
SUBJ: [JEWS]
SUBJ: [ESPIONAGE]
SUBJ: [CONSPIRACY] [9-11]
(12-23-2021 2045 -0500)
…